General Plan 2045

Commended the General Plan but expressed concern over future study area phrasing east of Greenville Road.

Praised the General Plan update as an inspiring statement of hope and foundation for local governance.

Supported the General Plan for providing housing opportunities so young families and workers can stay in Livermore.

Expressed concerns regarding UC Berkeley and UC Davis land grants, water crises, and growth predictions.

Discussed the need to protect the Urban Growth Boundary.

Suggested removal of the future study area East of Greenville.

Highlighted inconsistencies between protecting the Urban Growth Boundary and studying the East of Greenville area.

Addressed the commission regarding inaccurate population predictions.

Expressed concern regarding urban services boundary expansion, water resources, inaccurate growth calculations, and homelessness.

Requested removal of the East of Greenville study area and Valley Link references from the General Plan.

Expressed support for the current Urban Growth Boundary.

Expressed support for protecting the Urban Growth Boundary and keeping land east of Greenville as open space, while noting concerns over reduced agricultural resources and declining household sizes.

Representing Sheet Metal Workers Local 104, urged the city to incorporate local hire rules, family-wages, and state-registered apprenticeships into the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan and Diocese of Oakland housing projects.

Emphasized the importance of accurate population projections and provided historical data on Livermore's population growth.